Operator comparison
CDC Data Centres vs Equinix
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: CDC Data Centres — 19 facilities in 2 countries, Equinix — 269 facilities in 37 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
CDC Data Centres
19
Tracked facilities · Countries: 2
Where they operate: Australia, New Zealand
Equinix
269
Tracked facilities · Countries: 37
Where they operate: Australia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Côte d'Ivoire, Finland, France, Germany, Ghana, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Nigeria, Oman, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States
Portfolios side by side
| Field | CDC Data Centres | Equinix |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 19 | 269 |
| Countries | 2 | 37 |
| Cities | 6 | 110 |
| Published IT capacity | 3,308 MW (13 of 19 sites publish) | 125 MW (5 of 269 sites publish) |
| Operational | 14 | 265 |
| Under construction / announced | 5 | 4 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 2 | 12 |
| AI-ready sites | 13 | 32 |
| Most common certifications | Toitū net carbonzero certified, Australian Government Certified Strategic | ISO 27001, PCI DSS, ISO 22301, ISO 9001 |
| Average Coloprice Score | 19/100 across 19 scored sites | 34/100 across 269 scored sites |
| Awards and badges | 9 | 299 |
| Highest-scored facility | CDC Brooklyn Campus (29/100) | Equinix SL2x (60/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: CDC Data Centres — 19; Equinix — 269
- Countries: CDC Data Centres — 2; Equinix — 37
- Cities: CDC Data Centres — 6; Equinix — 110
- Published IT capacity: CDC Data Centres — 3,308 MW (13 of 19 sites publish); Equinix — 125 MW (5 of 269 sites publish)
- Operational: CDC Data Centres — 14; Equinix — 265
- Under construction / announced: CDC Data Centres — 5; Equinix — 4
- Liquid-cooled sites: CDC Data Centres — 2; Equinix — 12
- AI-ready sites: CDC Data Centres — 13; Equinix — 32
- Most common certifications: CDC Data Centres — Toitū net carbonzero certified, Australian Government Certified Strategic; Equinix — ISO 27001, PCI DSS, ISO 22301, ISO 9001
- Average Coloprice Score: CDC Data Centres — 19/100 across 19 scored sites; Equinix — 34/100 across 269 scored sites
- Awards and badges: CDC Data Centres — 9; Equinix — 299
- Highest-scored facility: CDC Data Centres — CDC Brooklyn Campus (29/100); Equinix — Equinix SL2x (60/100)
Highest-scored facility
CDC Data Centres
CDC Brooklyn Campus
Melbourne (Brooklyn), Australia · 350 MW · 29/100
Equinix
Equinix SL2x
Seoul (Goyang), South Korea · 22 MW · 60/100
Open CDC Data Centres profile →Open Equinix profile →
Other comparisons
CDC Data Centres vs NEXTDCCDC Data Centres vs VocusCDC Data Centres vs SparkCDC Data Centres vs Datacom GroupCDC Data Centres vs TenPeaks Data CentresEquinix vs NEXTDCEquinix vs VocusCologix vs Equinix