Operator comparison
Equinix vs Qu Data Centres
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: Equinix — 269 facilities in 37 countries, Qu Data Centres — 10 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
Equinix
269
Tracked facilities · Countries: 37
Where they operate: Australia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Côte d'Ivoire, Finland, France, Germany, Ghana, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Nigeria, Oman, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States
Qu Data Centres
10
Tracked facilities · Countries: 1
Where they operate: Canada
Portfolios side by side
| Field | Equinix | Qu Data Centres |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 269 | 10 |
| Countries | 37 | 1 |
| Cities | 110 | 7 |
| Published IT capacity | 125 MW (5 of 269 sites publish) | 27 MW (7 of 10 sites publish) |
| Operational | 265 | 10 |
| Under construction / announced | 4 | 0 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 12 | 0 |
| AI-ready sites | 32 | 0 |
| Most common certifications | ISO 27001, PCI DSS, ISO 22301, ISO 9001 | CSAE 3416, ISAE 3402, SOC 1, SOC 2 |
| Average Coloprice Score | 34/100 across 269 scored sites | 38/100 across 10 scored sites |
| Awards and badges | 299 | 8 |
| Highest-scored facility | Equinix SL2x (60/100) | Qu Data Centres TOR3 (53/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: Equinix — 269; Qu Data Centres — 10
- Countries: Equinix — 37; Qu Data Centres — 1
- Cities: Equinix — 110; Qu Data Centres — 7
- Published IT capacity: Equinix — 125 MW (5 of 269 sites publish); Qu Data Centres — 27 MW (7 of 10 sites publish)
- Operational: Equinix — 265; Qu Data Centres — 10
- Under construction / announced: Equinix — 4; Qu Data Centres — 0
- Liquid-cooled sites: Equinix — 12; Qu Data Centres — 0
- AI-ready sites: Equinix — 32; Qu Data Centres — 0
- Most common certifications: Equinix — ISO 27001, PCI DSS, ISO 22301, ISO 9001; Qu Data Centres — CSAE 3416, ISAE 3402, SOC 1, SOC 2
- Average Coloprice Score: Equinix — 34/100 across 269 scored sites; Qu Data Centres — 38/100 across 10 scored sites
- Awards and badges: Equinix — 299; Qu Data Centres — 8
- Highest-scored facility: Equinix — Equinix SL2x (60/100); Qu Data Centres — Qu Data Centres TOR3 (53/100)
Highest-scored facility
Equinix
Equinix SL2x
Seoul (Goyang), South Korea · 22 MW · 60/100
Qu Data Centres
Qu Data Centres TOR3
Markham, Canada · 10 MW · 53/100
Open Equinix profile →Open Qu Data Centres profile →
Other comparisons
Equinix vs NEXTDCCDC Data Centres vs EquinixEquinix vs VocusCologix vs EquinixEquinix vs eStruxtureEquinix vs GTDAscenty (Digital Realty) vs EquinixEquinix vs Scala Data Centers