▮▮Coloprice

Operator comparison

KT Cloud vs Samsung SDS

Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: KT Cloud — 8 facilities in 1 countries, Samsung SDS — 5 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.

Portfolios side by side

FieldKT CloudSamsung SDS
Tracked facilities85
Countries11
Cities35
Published IT capacitynot publishednot published
Operational85
Under construction / announced00
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Most common certificationsTIA-942 Rated 3-4 (per operator description)not published
Average Coloprice Score17/100 across 8 scored sites11/100 across 5 scored sites
Awards and badges2not published
Highest-scored facilityKT Daejeon IDC (29/100)Samsung SDS Chuncheon Data Center (17/100)

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: KT Cloud — 8; Samsung SDS — 5
  • Cities: KT Cloud — 3; Samsung SDS — 5
  • Operational: KT Cloud — 8; Samsung SDS — 5
  • Average Coloprice Score: KT Cloud — 17/100 across 8 scored sites; Samsung SDS — 11/100 across 5 scored sites
  • Highest-scored facility: KT Cloud — KT Daejeon IDC (29/100); Samsung SDS — Samsung SDS Chuncheon Data Center (17/100)

Published for only one side: Most common certifications, Awards and badges.

Highest-scored facility

Open KT Cloud profile →Open Samsung SDS profile →

Other comparisons

KT Cloud vs SK BroadbandDigital Edge vs KT CloudSK Broadband vs Samsung SDSDigital Edge vs Samsung SDS