▮▮Coloprice

Operator comparison

KINX vs Samsung SDS

Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: KINX — 5 facilities in 1 countries, Samsung SDS — 5 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.

Portfolios side by side

FieldKINXSamsung SDS
Tracked facilities55
Countries11
Cities35
Published IT capacity10 MW (1 of 5 sites publish)not published
Operational55
Under construction / announced00
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites10
Most common certificationsTier III+ (operator-claimed)not published
Average Coloprice Score16/100 across 5 scored sites11/100 across 5 scored sites
Awards and badges1not published
Highest-scored facilityKINX Gwacheon (44/100)Samsung SDS Chuncheon Data Center (17/100)

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Cities: KINX — 3; Samsung SDS — 5
  • AI-ready sites: KINX — 1; Samsung SDS — 0
  • Average Coloprice Score: KINX — 16/100 across 5 scored sites; Samsung SDS — 11/100 across 5 scored sites
  • Highest-scored facility: KINX — KINX Gwacheon (44/100); Samsung SDS — Samsung SDS Chuncheon Data Center (17/100)

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity, Most common certifications, Awards and badges.

Highest-scored facility

Open KINX profile →Open Samsung SDS profile →

Other comparisons

KINX vs KT CloudKINX vs LG UplusKT Cloud vs Samsung SDSLG Uplus vs Samsung SDS