▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Hyderabad, India vs Mumbai, India

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Hyderabad — 24 facilities from 20 operators, Mumbai — 42 facilities from 20 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldHyderabadMumbai
Tracked facilities2442
Operators2020
Published IT capacity3,027 MW (11 of 24 sites publish)553 MW (19 of 42 sites publish)
Operational1637
Under construction / announced85
Tier III+ certified sites68
Sites with any certification814
Liquid-cooled sites33
AI-ready sites66
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.109$0.109
Average Coloprice Score22/100 across 24 sites23/100 across 42 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Hyderabad — 24; Mumbai — 42
  • Published IT capacity: Hyderabad — 3,027 MW (11 of 24 sites publish); Mumbai — 553 MW (19 of 42 sites publish)
  • Operational: Hyderabad — 16; Mumbai — 37
  • Under construction / announced: Hyderabad — 8; Mumbai — 5
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Hyderabad — 6; Mumbai — 8
  • Sites with any certification: Hyderabad — 8; Mumbai — 14
  • Average Coloprice Score: Hyderabad — 22/100 across 24 sites; Mumbai — 23/100 across 42 sites

Top facilities by score

Hyderabad, India

Mumbai, India

Open Hyderabad data centers →Open Mumbai data centers →Colocation pricing in Hyderabad →Colocation pricing in Mumbai →

Other comparisons

Hyderabad vs Navi MumbaiChennai vs HyderabadMumbai vs Navi MumbaiChennai vs MumbaiMumbai vs Singapore