Market comparison
Batam, Indonesia vs Cikarang, Bekasi (STT Jakarta campus), Indonesia
Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Batam — 6 facilities from 6 operators, Cikarang, Bekasi (STT Jakarta campus) — 14 facilities from 6 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.
Batam, Indonesia
6
Tracked facilities · Operators: 6
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month: not published
Cikarang, Bekasi (STT Jakarta campus), Indonesia
14
Tracked facilities · Operators: 6
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month: not published
Markets side by side
| Field | Batam | Cikarang, Bekasi (STT Jakarta campus) |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 6 | 14 |
| Operators | 6 | 6 |
| Published IT capacity | 1,028 MW (5 of 6 sites publish) | 437 MW (13 of 14 sites publish) |
| Operational | 2 | 7 |
| Under construction / announced | 4 | 7 |
| Tier III+ certified sites | 0 | 5 |
| Sites with any certification | 0 | 6 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 2 | 2 |
| AI-ready sites | 2 | 4 |
| Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month | not published | not published |
| Benchmark change, yoy | not published | not published |
| Industrial power tariff, $/kWh | $0.063 | $0.063 |
| Average Coloprice Score | 19/100 across 6 sites | 34/100 across 14 sites |
| Latency between the two | not published | |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: Batam — 6; Cikarang, Bekasi (STT Jakarta campus) — 14
- Published IT capacity: Batam — 1,028 MW (5 of 6 sites publish); Cikarang, Bekasi (STT Jakarta campus) — 437 MW (13 of 14 sites publish)
- Operational: Batam — 2; Cikarang, Bekasi (STT Jakarta campus) — 7
- Under construction / announced: Batam — 4; Cikarang, Bekasi (STT Jakarta campus) — 7
- Tier III+ certified sites: Batam — 0; Cikarang, Bekasi (STT Jakarta campus) — 5
- Sites with any certification: Batam — 0; Cikarang, Bekasi (STT Jakarta campus) — 6
- AI-ready sites: Batam — 2; Cikarang, Bekasi (STT Jakarta campus) — 4
- Average Coloprice Score: Batam — 19/100 across 6 sites; Cikarang, Bekasi (STT Jakarta campus) — 34/100 across 14 sites
Top facilities by score
Batam, Indonesia
- DayOne Nongsa Digital Park Campus (NDP1, ex-GDS Batam) DayOne · 72 MW
- DayOne Kabil Industrial Tech Park (KITP) DayOne Data Centers · 450 MW
- NeutraDC Nxera Batam NeutraDC (Telkom Indonesia) / Nxera · 50 MW
Cikarang, Bekasi (STT Jakarta campus), Indonesia
- K2 JKT01 K2 Data Centres (Kuok Group) / Sinar Mas Land · 20 MW
- STT Jakarta 1 STT GDC Indonesia · 18 MW
- MettaDC ID01 MettaDC (PT Mettadc Teknologi Indonesia)
Open Batam data centers →Open Cikarang, Bekasi (STT Jakarta campus) data centers →Colocation pricing in Batam →Colocation pricing in Cikarang, Bekasi (STT Jakarta campus) →
Other comparisons
Batam vs Jakarta (South Jakarta)Batam vs SurabayaBatam vs SingaporeCikarang, Bekasi (STT Jakarta campus) vs Jakarta (South Jakarta)Cikarang, Bekasi (STT Jakarta campus) vs Surabaya