▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Katowice, Poland vs Wrocław, Poland

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Katowice — 6 facilities from 6 operators, Wrocław — 7 facilities from 7 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldKatowiceWrocław
Tracked facilities67
Operators67
Published IT capacitynot publishednot published
Operational67
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites10
Sites with any certification12
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.177$0.177
Average Coloprice Score11/100 across 6 sites11/100 across 7 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Katowice — 6; Wrocław — 7
  • Operators: Katowice — 6; Wrocław — 7
  • Operational: Katowice — 6; Wrocław — 7
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Katowice — 1; Wrocław — 0
  • Sites with any certification: Katowice — 1; Wrocław — 2
  • Average Coloprice Score: Katowice — 11/100 across 6 sites; Wrocław — 11/100 across 7 sites

Top facilities by score

Open Katowice data centers →Open Wrocław data centers →Colocation pricing in Katowice →Colocation pricing in Wrocław →

Other comparisons

Katowice vs WarsawKatowice vs PoznańWarsaw vs WrocławPoznań vs Wrocław