Market comparison
Isando, Johannesburg, South Africa vs Bryanston, Johannesburg, South Africa
Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Isando, Johannesburg — 6 facilities from 3 operators, Bryanston, Johannesburg — 3 facilities from 2 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.
Isando, Johannesburg, South Africa
6
Tracked facilities · Operators: 3
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month: not published
Bryanston, Johannesburg, South Africa
3
Tracked facilities · Operators: 2
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month: not published
Markets side by side
| Field | Isando, Johannesburg | Bryanston, Johannesburg |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 6 | 3 |
| Operators | 3 | 2 |
| Published IT capacity | 52 MW (2 of 6 sites publish) | 9 MW (2 of 3 sites publish) |
| Operational | 5 | 3 |
| Under construction / announced | 1 | 0 |
| Tier III+ certified sites | 1 | 1 |
| Sites with any certification | 1 | 1 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 1 | 0 |
| AI-ready sites | 0 | 0 |
| Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month | not published | not published |
| Benchmark change, yoy | not published | not published |
| Industrial power tariff, $/kWh | $0.144 | $0.144 |
| Average Coloprice Score | 19/100 across 6 sites | 23/100 across 3 sites |
| Latency between the two | not published | |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: Isando, Johannesburg — 6; Bryanston, Johannesburg — 3
- Operators: Isando, Johannesburg — 3; Bryanston, Johannesburg — 2
- Published IT capacity: Isando, Johannesburg — 52 MW (2 of 6 sites publish); Bryanston, Johannesburg — 9 MW (2 of 3 sites publish)
- Operational: Isando, Johannesburg — 5; Bryanston, Johannesburg — 3
- Under construction / announced: Isando, Johannesburg — 1; Bryanston, Johannesburg — 0
- Liquid-cooled sites: Isando, Johannesburg — 1; Bryanston, Johannesburg — 0
- Average Coloprice Score: Isando, Johannesburg — 19/100 across 6 sites; Bryanston, Johannesburg — 23/100 across 3 sites
Top facilities by score
Isando, Johannesburg, South Africa
- OADC Isando JNB1 Open Access Data Centres (WIOCC) · 12 MW
- Teraco JB7 (Isando) Teraco (Digital Realty) · 40 MW
- Teraco JB1 (Isando) Teraco (Digital Realty)
Bryanston, Johannesburg, South Africa
- 141 Sivewright Data Center T-Systems SA (Gijima)
- OADC Parklands (JNB3) Open Access Data Centres (WIOCC) · 6 MW
- OADC Bryanston (JNB2) Open Access Data Centres (WIOCC) · 3 MW
Open Isando, Johannesburg data centers →Open Bryanston, Johannesburg data centers →Colocation pricing in Isando, Johannesburg →Colocation pricing in Bryanston, Johannesburg →
Other comparisons
Isando, Johannesburg vs Johannesburg (Midrand)Isando, Johannesburg vs Samrand, CenturionBryanston, Johannesburg vs Johannesburg (Midrand)Bryanston, Johannesburg vs Samrand, Centurion