▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Geneva, Switzerland vs Zurich, Switzerland

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Geneva — 4 facilities from 3 operators, Zurich — 10 facilities from 6 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldGenevaZurich
Tracked facilities410
Operators36
Published IT capacity42 MW (2 of 4 sites publish)77 MW (4 of 10 sites publish)
Operational410
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites01
Sites with any certification14
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.292$0.292
Average Coloprice Score24/100 across 4 sites23/100 across 10 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Geneva — 4; Zurich — 10
  • Operators: Geneva — 3; Zurich — 6
  • Published IT capacity: Geneva — 42 MW (2 of 4 sites publish); Zurich — 77 MW (4 of 10 sites publish)
  • Operational: Geneva — 4; Zurich — 10
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Geneva — 0; Zurich — 1
  • Sites with any certification: Geneva — 1; Zurich — 4
  • Average Coloprice Score: Geneva — 24/100 across 4 sites; Zurich — 23/100 across 10 sites

Top facilities by score

Geneva, Switzerland

Zurich, Switzerland

Open Geneva data centers →Open Zurich data centers →Colocation pricing in Geneva →Colocation pricing in Zurich →

Other comparisons

Geneva vs GlattbruggGlattbrugg vs Zurich