▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Geneva, Switzerland vs Zurich (Winterthur), Switzerland

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Geneva — 6 facilities from 5 operators, Zurich (Winterthur) — 7 facilities from 7 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldGenevaZurich (Winterthur)
Tracked facilities67
Operators57
Published IT capacity42 MW (2 of 6 sites publish)42 MW (2 of 7 sites publish)
Operational67
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites00
Sites with any certification11
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.292$0.292
Average Coloprice Score19/100 across 6 sites14/100 across 7 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Geneva — 6; Zurich (Winterthur) — 7
  • Operators: Geneva — 5; Zurich (Winterthur) — 7
  • Published IT capacity: Geneva — 42 MW (2 of 6 sites publish); Zurich (Winterthur) — 42 MW (2 of 7 sites publish)
  • Operational: Geneva — 6; Zurich (Winterthur) — 7
  • Average Coloprice Score: Geneva — 19/100 across 6 sites; Zurich (Winterthur) — 14/100 across 7 sites

Top facilities by score

Geneva, Switzerland

Zurich (Winterthur), Switzerland

Open Geneva data centers →Open Zurich (Winterthur) data centers →Colocation pricing in Geneva →Colocation pricing in Zurich (Winterthur) →

Other comparisons

Geneva vs ZurichGeneva vs GlattbruggZurich (Winterthur) vs ZurichGlattbrugg vs Zurich (Winterthur)