▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Geneva, Switzerland vs Glattbrugg, Switzerland

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Geneva — 4 facilities from 3 operators, Glattbrugg — 5 facilities from 2 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldGenevaGlattbrugg
Tracked facilities45
Operators32
Published IT capacity42 MW (2 of 4 sites publish)15 MW (1 of 5 sites publish)
Operational44
Under construction / announced01
Tier III+ certified sites00
Sites with any certification14
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.292$0.292
Average Coloprice Score24/100 across 4 sites26/100 across 5 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Geneva — 4; Glattbrugg — 5
  • Operators: Geneva — 3; Glattbrugg — 2
  • Published IT capacity: Geneva — 42 MW (2 of 4 sites publish); Glattbrugg — 15 MW (1 of 5 sites publish)
  • Under construction / announced: Geneva — 0; Glattbrugg — 1
  • Sites with any certification: Geneva — 1; Glattbrugg — 4
  • Average Coloprice Score: Geneva — 24/100 across 4 sites; Glattbrugg — 26/100 across 5 sites

Top facilities by score

Geneva, Switzerland

Glattbrugg, Switzerland

  • ZUR1 Digital Realty (Interxion)
  • ZUR2 Digital Realty (Interxion)
  • ZUR4 Digital Realty (Interxion) · 15 MW

Open Geneva data centers →Open Glattbrugg data centers →Colocation pricing in Geneva →Colocation pricing in Glattbrugg →

Other comparisons

Geneva vs ZurichGlattbrugg vs Zurich