Operator comparison
AIMS Data Centre vs Bridge Data Centres
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: AIMS Data Centre — 7 facilities in 1 countries, Bridge Data Centres — 7 facilities in 3 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
AIMS Data Centre
7
Tracked facilities · Countries: 1
Where they operate: Malaysia
Bridge Data Centres
7
Tracked facilities · Countries: 3
Where they operate: India, Malaysia, Thailand
Portfolios side by side
| Field | AIMS Data Centre | Bridge Data Centres |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 7 | 7 |
| Countries | 1 | 3 |
| Cities | 3 | 6 |
| Published IT capacity | 228 MW (4 of 7 sites publish) | not published |
| Operational | 6 | 4 |
| Under construction / announced | 1 | 3 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 0 | 0 |
| AI-ready sites | 2 | 0 |
| Most common certifications | ISO 9001, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, ISO/IEC 20000-1 | PCI DSS, SOC 2 |
| Average Coloprice Score | 29/100 across 7 scored sites | 9/100 across 7 scored sites |
| Awards and badges | 8 | 2 |
| Highest-scored facility | AIMS Cyberjaya Block 2 (51/100) | Bridge Data Centres MY01 (24/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Countries: AIMS Data Centre — 1; Bridge Data Centres — 3
- Cities: AIMS Data Centre — 3; Bridge Data Centres — 6
- Operational: AIMS Data Centre — 6; Bridge Data Centres — 4
- Under construction / announced: AIMS Data Centre — 1; Bridge Data Centres — 3
- AI-ready sites: AIMS Data Centre — 2; Bridge Data Centres — 0
- Most common certifications: AIMS Data Centre — ISO 9001, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, ISO/IEC 20000-1; Bridge Data Centres — PCI DSS, SOC 2
- Average Coloprice Score: AIMS Data Centre — 29/100 across 7 scored sites; Bridge Data Centres — 9/100 across 7 scored sites
- Awards and badges: AIMS Data Centre — 8; Bridge Data Centres — 2
- Highest-scored facility: AIMS Data Centre — AIMS Cyberjaya Block 2 (51/100); Bridge Data Centres — Bridge Data Centres MY01 (24/100)
Published for only one side: Published IT capacity.
Highest-scored facility
AIMS Data Centre
AIMS Cyberjaya Block 2
Cyberjaya, Malaysia · 8 MW · 51/100
Bridge Data Centres
Bridge Data Centres MY01
Cyberjaya, Malaysia · 24/100
Open AIMS Data Centre profile →Open Bridge Data Centres profile →
Other comparisons
AIMS Data Centre vs EquinixAIMS Data Centre vs Open DCBridge Data Centres vs EquinixBridge Data Centres vs Open DC