Operator comparison
Bridge Data Centres vs Google
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: Bridge Data Centres — 8 facilities in 3 countries, Google — 24 facilities in 2 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
Bridge Data Centres
8
Tracked facilities · Countries: 3
Where they operate: India, Malaysia, Thailand
24
Tracked facilities · Countries: 2
Where they operate: Malaysia, United States
Portfolios side by side
| Field | Bridge Data Centres | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 8 | 24 |
| Countries | 3 | 2 |
| Cities | 7 | 24 |
| Published IT capacity | 134 MW (1 of 8 sites publish) | 2,700 MW (1 of 24 sites publish) |
| Operational | 4 | 12 |
| Under construction / announced | 4 | 12 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 1 | 2 |
| AI-ready sites | 1 | 21 |
| Most common certifications | PCI DSS, SOC 2 | not published |
| Average Coloprice Score | 11/100 across 8 scored sites | 7/100 across 24 scored sites |
| Awards and badges | not published | not published |
| Highest-scored facility | Bridge Data Centres MY01 (24/100) | Google Project Tembo (Laramie County) (17/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: Bridge Data Centres — 8; Google — 24
- Countries: Bridge Data Centres — 3; Google — 2
- Cities: Bridge Data Centres — 7; Google — 24
- Published IT capacity: Bridge Data Centres — 134 MW (1 of 8 sites publish); Google — 2,700 MW (1 of 24 sites publish)
- Operational: Bridge Data Centres — 4; Google — 12
- Under construction / announced: Bridge Data Centres — 4; Google — 12
- Liquid-cooled sites: Bridge Data Centres — 1; Google — 2
- AI-ready sites: Bridge Data Centres — 1; Google — 21
- Average Coloprice Score: Bridge Data Centres — 11/100 across 8 scored sites; Google — 7/100 across 24 scored sites
- Highest-scored facility: Bridge Data Centres — Bridge Data Centres MY01 (24/100); Google — Google Project Tembo (Laramie County) (17/100)
Published for only one side: Most common certifications.
Highest-scored facility
Bridge Data Centres
Bridge Data Centres MY01
Cyberjaya, Malaysia · 24/100
Google Project Tembo (Laramie County)
Cheyenne, WY, United States · 2700 MW · 17/100
Open Bridge Data Centres profile →Open Google profile →
Other comparisons
AIMS Data Centre vs Bridge Data CentresBridge Data Centres vs Open DCAIMS Data Centre vs GoogleGoogle vs Open DC