Operator comparison
atNorth vs Elisa
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: atNorth — 12 facilities in 5 countries, Elisa — 7 facilities in 2 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
atNorth
12
Tracked facilities · Countries: 5
Where they operate: Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden
Elisa
7
Tracked facilities · Countries: 2
Where they operate: Estonia, Finland
Portfolios side by side
| Field | atNorth | Elisa |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 12 | 7 |
| Countries | 5 | 2 |
| Cities | 10 | 5 |
| Published IT capacity | 1,350 MW (12 of 12 sites publish) | 10 MW (1 of 7 sites publish) |
| Operational | 7 | 7 |
| Under construction / announced | 5 | 0 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 10 | 0 |
| AI-ready sites | 10 | 0 |
| Most common certifications | ISO 14001, ISO 45001, ISO 9001, ISO/IEC 27001 | Tier 2 compliant (operator's own designation, not an independent Uptime certification), EN 50600, ISO 14001, ISO 27001 |
| Average Coloprice Score | 33/100 across 12 scored sites | 12/100 across 7 scored sites |
| Awards and badges | 13 | 3 |
| Highest-scored facility | atNorth FIN02 Helsinki Metro Site (Espoo) (44/100) | Elisa Tapiola Data Center (24/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: atNorth — 12; Elisa — 7
- Countries: atNorth — 5; Elisa — 2
- Cities: atNorth — 10; Elisa — 5
- Published IT capacity: atNorth — 1,350 MW (12 of 12 sites publish); Elisa — 10 MW (1 of 7 sites publish)
- Under construction / announced: atNorth — 5; Elisa — 0
- Liquid-cooled sites: atNorth — 10; Elisa — 0
- AI-ready sites: atNorth — 10; Elisa — 0
- Most common certifications: atNorth — ISO 14001, ISO 45001, ISO 9001, ISO/IEC 27001; Elisa — Tier 2 compliant (operator's own designation, not an independent Uptime certification), EN 50600, ISO 14001, ISO 27001
- Average Coloprice Score: atNorth — 33/100 across 12 scored sites; Elisa — 12/100 across 7 scored sites
- Awards and badges: atNorth — 13; Elisa — 3
- Highest-scored facility: atNorth — atNorth FIN02 Helsinki Metro Site (Espoo) (44/100); Elisa — Elisa Tapiola Data Center (24/100)
Highest-scored facility
atNorth
atNorth FIN02 Helsinki Metro Site (Espoo)
Helsinki (Espoo), Finland · 40 MW · 44/100
Elisa
Elisa Tapiola Data Center
Espoo, Finland · 10 MW · 24/100
Open atNorth profile →Open Elisa profile →
Other comparisons
Equinix vs atNorthInternet á Íslandi hf vs atNorthElisa vs Equinix