Operator comparison
atNorth vs Equinix
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: atNorth — 12 facilities in 5 countries, Equinix — 269 facilities in 37 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
atNorth
12
Tracked facilities · Countries: 5
Where they operate: Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden
Equinix
269
Tracked facilities · Countries: 37
Where they operate: Australia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Côte d'Ivoire, Finland, France, Germany, Ghana, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Nigeria, Oman, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States
Portfolios side by side
| Field | atNorth | Equinix |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 12 | 269 |
| Countries | 5 | 37 |
| Cities | 10 | 110 |
| Published IT capacity | 1,350 MW (12 of 12 sites publish) | 125 MW (5 of 269 sites publish) |
| Operational | 7 | 265 |
| Under construction / announced | 5 | 4 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 10 | 12 |
| AI-ready sites | 10 | 32 |
| Most common certifications | ISO 14001, ISO 45001, ISO 9001, ISO/IEC 27001 | ISO 27001, PCI DSS, ISO 22301, ISO 9001 |
| Average Coloprice Score | 33/100 across 12 scored sites | 34/100 across 269 scored sites |
| Awards and badges | 13 | 299 |
| Highest-scored facility | atNorth FIN02 Helsinki Metro Site (Espoo) (44/100) | Equinix SL2x (60/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: atNorth — 12; Equinix — 269
- Countries: atNorth — 5; Equinix — 37
- Cities: atNorth — 10; Equinix — 110
- Published IT capacity: atNorth — 1,350 MW (12 of 12 sites publish); Equinix — 125 MW (5 of 269 sites publish)
- Operational: atNorth — 7; Equinix — 265
- Under construction / announced: atNorth — 5; Equinix — 4
- Liquid-cooled sites: atNorth — 10; Equinix — 12
- AI-ready sites: atNorth — 10; Equinix — 32
- Most common certifications: atNorth — ISO 14001, ISO 45001, ISO 9001, ISO/IEC 27001; Equinix — ISO 27001, PCI DSS, ISO 22301, ISO 9001
- Average Coloprice Score: atNorth — 33/100 across 12 scored sites; Equinix — 34/100 across 269 scored sites
- Awards and badges: atNorth — 13; Equinix — 299
- Highest-scored facility: atNorth — atNorth FIN02 Helsinki Metro Site (Espoo) (44/100); Equinix — Equinix SL2x (60/100)
Highest-scored facility
atNorth
atNorth FIN02 Helsinki Metro Site (Espoo)
Helsinki (Espoo), Finland · 40 MW · 44/100
Equinix
Equinix SL2x
Seoul (Goyang), South Korea · 22 MW · 60/100
Open atNorth profile →Open Equinix profile →
Other comparisons
Elisa vs atNorthInternet á Íslandi hf vs atNorthEquinix vs NEXTDCCDC Data Centres vs EquinixEquinix vs VocusCologix vs EquinixEquinix vs eStruxtureEquinix vs Qu Data Centres