▮▮Coloprice

Operator comparison

Blix Solutions vs Skygard

Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: Blix Solutions — 3 facilities in 1 countries, Skygard — 3 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.

Portfolios side by side

FieldBlix SolutionsSkygard
Tracked facilities33
Countries11
Cities11
Published IT capacitynot published36 MW (3 of 3 sites publish)
Operational33
Under construction / announced00
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Most common certificationsnot publishednot published
Average Coloprice Score9/100 across 3 scored sites24/100 across 3 scored sites
Awards and badgesnot published3
Highest-scored facilityBlix CJH Oslo (9/100)Skygard OSL1 (25/100)

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Average Coloprice Score: Blix Solutions — 9/100 across 3 scored sites; Skygard — 24/100 across 3 scored sites
  • Highest-scored facility: Blix Solutions — Blix CJH Oslo (9/100); Skygard — Skygard OSL1 (25/100)

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity, Awards and badges.

Highest-scored facility

Open Blix Solutions profile →Open Skygard profile →

Other comparisons

Blix Solutions vs Green MountainBlix Solutions vs GlobalConnect GroupGreen Mountain vs SkygardGlobalConnect Group vs Skygard