▮▮Coloprice

Operator comparison

Datacom Group vs Spark

Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: Datacom Group — 6 facilities in 1 countries, Spark — 5 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.

Portfolios side by side

FieldDatacom GroupSpark
Tracked facilities65
Countries11
Cities45
Published IT capacity37 MW (5 of 6 sites publish)not published
Operational65
Under construction / announced00
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Most common certificationsISAE 3000, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, Uptime Institute M&O Stamp of Approvalnot published
Average Coloprice Score25/100 across 6 scored sites9/100 across 5 scored sites
Awards and badges10not published
Highest-scored facilityDatacom Kapua Data Centre (38/100)Spark Digital Mayoral Drive (9/100)

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Datacom Group — 6; Spark — 5
  • Cities: Datacom Group — 4; Spark — 5
  • Operational: Datacom Group — 6; Spark — 5
  • Average Coloprice Score: Datacom Group — 25/100 across 6 scored sites; Spark — 9/100 across 5 scored sites
  • Highest-scored facility: Datacom Group — Datacom Kapua Data Centre (38/100); Spark — Spark Digital Mayoral Drive (9/100)

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity, Most common certifications, Awards and badges.

Highest-scored facility

Open Datacom Group profile →Open Spark profile →

Other comparisons

Datacom Group vs TenPeaks Data CentresCDC Data Centres vs Datacom GroupSpark vs TenPeaks Data CentresCDC Data Centres vs Spark