Operator comparison
CDC Data Centres vs Spark
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: CDC Data Centres — 19 facilities in 2 countries, Spark — 5 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
CDC Data Centres
19
Tracked facilities · Countries: 2
Where they operate: Australia, New Zealand
Spark
5
Tracked facilities · Countries: 1
Where they operate: New Zealand
Portfolios side by side
| Field | CDC Data Centres | Spark |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 19 | 5 |
| Countries | 2 | 1 |
| Cities | 6 | 5 |
| Published IT capacity | 3,308 MW (13 of 19 sites publish) | not published |
| Operational | 14 | 5 |
| Under construction / announced | 5 | 0 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 2 | 0 |
| AI-ready sites | 13 | 0 |
| Most common certifications | Toitū net carbonzero certified, Australian Government Certified Strategic | not published |
| Average Coloprice Score | 19/100 across 19 scored sites | 9/100 across 5 scored sites |
| Awards and badges | 9 | not published |
| Highest-scored facility | CDC Brooklyn Campus (29/100) | Spark Digital Mayoral Drive (9/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: CDC Data Centres — 19; Spark — 5
- Countries: CDC Data Centres — 2; Spark — 1
- Cities: CDC Data Centres — 6; Spark — 5
- Operational: CDC Data Centres — 14; Spark — 5
- Under construction / announced: CDC Data Centres — 5; Spark — 0
- Liquid-cooled sites: CDC Data Centres — 2; Spark — 0
- AI-ready sites: CDC Data Centres — 13; Spark — 0
- Average Coloprice Score: CDC Data Centres — 19/100 across 19 scored sites; Spark — 9/100 across 5 scored sites
- Highest-scored facility: CDC Data Centres — CDC Brooklyn Campus (29/100); Spark — Spark Digital Mayoral Drive (9/100)
Published for only one side: Published IT capacity, Most common certifications, Awards and badges.
Highest-scored facility
CDC Data Centres
CDC Brooklyn Campus
Melbourne (Brooklyn), Australia · 350 MW · 29/100
Spark
Spark Digital Mayoral Drive
Auckland, New Zealand · 9/100
Open CDC Data Centres profile →Open Spark profile →
Other comparisons
CDC Data Centres vs NEXTDCCDC Data Centres vs EquinixCDC Data Centres vs VocusCDC Data Centres vs Datacom GroupCDC Data Centres vs TenPeaks Data CentresDatacom Group vs SparkSpark vs TenPeaks Data Centres