▮▮Coloprice

Operator comparison

e& (Etisalat) vs Khazna Data Centers

Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: e& (Etisalat) — 4 facilities in 1 countries, Khazna Data Centers — 41 facilities in 3 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.

Portfolios side by side

Fielde& (Etisalat)Khazna Data Centers
Tracked facilities441
Countries13
Cities39
Published IT capacity5 MW (1 of 4 sites publish)1,008 MW (38 of 41 sites publish)
Operational432
Under construction / announced09
Liquid-cooled sites01
AI-ready sites04
Most common certificationsTier III, Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Constructed Facility, Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Design Documents, Uptime Institute Tier III Gold Certification of Operational SustainabilityUptime Institute Tier III Certification of Constructed Facility, Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Design Documents, LEED Gold, SCS Global Services Zero Waste to Landfill Certification
Average Coloprice Score34/100 across 4 scored sites24/100 across 41 scored sites
Awards and badges628
Highest-scored facilitye& (Etisalat) Data Center Khalifa City (51/100)Khazna AUH6 Masdar City (51/100)

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: e& (Etisalat) — 4; Khazna Data Centers — 41
  • Countries: e& (Etisalat) — 1; Khazna Data Centers — 3
  • Cities: e& (Etisalat) — 3; Khazna Data Centers — 9
  • Published IT capacity: e& (Etisalat) — 5 MW (1 of 4 sites publish); Khazna Data Centers — 1,008 MW (38 of 41 sites publish)
  • Operational: e& (Etisalat) — 4; Khazna Data Centers — 32
  • Under construction / announced: e& (Etisalat) — 0; Khazna Data Centers — 9
  • Liquid-cooled sites: e& (Etisalat) — 0; Khazna Data Centers — 1
  • AI-ready sites: e& (Etisalat) — 0; Khazna Data Centers — 4
  • Most common certifications: e& (Etisalat) — Tier III, Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Constructed Facility, Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Design Documents, Uptime Institute Tier III Gold Certification of Operational Sustainability; Khazna Data Centers — Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Constructed Facility, Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Design Documents, LEED Gold, SCS Global Services Zero Waste to Landfill Certification
  • Average Coloprice Score: e& (Etisalat) — 34/100 across 4 scored sites; Khazna Data Centers — 24/100 across 41 scored sites
  • Awards and badges: e& (Etisalat) — 6; Khazna Data Centers — 28
  • Highest-scored facility: e& (Etisalat) — e& (Etisalat) Data Center Khalifa City (51/100); Khazna Data Centers — Khazna AUH6 Masdar City (51/100)

Highest-scored facility

Open e& (Etisalat) profile →Open Khazna Data Centers profile →

Other comparisons

Equinix vs e& (Etisalat)Moro Hub (Digital DEWA) vs e& (Etisalat)Equinix vs Khazna Data CentersKhazna Data Centers vs Moro Hub (Digital DEWA)