Operator comparison
Equinix vs KIO Networks
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: Equinix — 269 facilities in 37 countries, KIO Networks — 22 facilities in 5 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
Equinix
269
Tracked facilities · Countries: 37
Where they operate: Australia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Côte d'Ivoire, Finland, France, Germany, Ghana, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Nigeria, Oman, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States
KIO Networks
22
Tracked facilities · Countries: 5
Where they operate: Colombia, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Mexico, Panama
Portfolios side by side
| Field | Equinix | KIO Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 269 | 22 |
| Countries | 37 | 5 |
| Cities | 110 | 16 |
| Published IT capacity | 125 MW (5 of 269 sites publish) | 56 MW (4 of 22 sites publish) |
| Operational | 265 | 22 |
| Under construction / announced | 4 | 0 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 12 | 1 |
| AI-ready sites | 32 | 0 |
| Most common certifications | ISO 27001, PCI DSS, ISO 22301, ISO 9001 | ISO 9001, SSAE18 SOC 1, ISO 27001, ISO/IEC 37001:2016 |
| Average Coloprice Score | 34/100 across 269 scored sites | 27/100 across 22 scored sites |
| Awards and badges | 299 | 18 |
| Highest-scored facility | Equinix SL2x (60/100) | KIO QRO|1 (El Marqués) (54/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: Equinix — 269; KIO Networks — 22
- Countries: Equinix — 37; KIO Networks — 5
- Cities: Equinix — 110; KIO Networks — 16
- Published IT capacity: Equinix — 125 MW (5 of 269 sites publish); KIO Networks — 56 MW (4 of 22 sites publish)
- Operational: Equinix — 265; KIO Networks — 22
- Under construction / announced: Equinix — 4; KIO Networks — 0
- Liquid-cooled sites: Equinix — 12; KIO Networks — 1
- AI-ready sites: Equinix — 32; KIO Networks — 0
- Most common certifications: Equinix — ISO 27001, PCI DSS, ISO 22301, ISO 9001; KIO Networks — ISO 9001, SSAE18 SOC 1, ISO 27001, ISO/IEC 37001:2016
- Average Coloprice Score: Equinix — 34/100 across 269 scored sites; KIO Networks — 27/100 across 22 scored sites
- Awards and badges: Equinix — 299; KIO Networks — 18
- Highest-scored facility: Equinix — Equinix SL2x (60/100); KIO Networks — KIO QRO|1 (El Marqués) (54/100)
Highest-scored facility
Equinix
Equinix SL2x
Seoul (Goyang), South Korea · 22 MW · 60/100
KIO Networks
KIO QRO|1 (El Marqués)
Querétaro, Mexico · 28 MW · 54/100
Open Equinix profile →Open KIO Networks profile →
Other comparisons
Equinix vs NEXTDCCDC Data Centres vs EquinixEquinix vs VocusCologix vs EquinixEquinix vs eStruxtureEquinix vs Qu Data CentresEquinix vs GTDAscenty (Digital Realty) vs Equinix