Operator comparison
Equinix vs Templus
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: Equinix — 269 facilities in 37 countries, Templus — 18 facilities in 8 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
Equinix
269
Tracked facilities · Countries: 37
Where they operate: Australia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Côte d'Ivoire, Finland, France, Germany, Ghana, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Nigeria, Oman, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States
Templus
18
Tracked facilities · Countries: 8
Where they operate: Denmark, France, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom
Portfolios side by side
| Field | Equinix | Templus |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 269 | 18 |
| Countries | 37 | 8 |
| Cities | 110 | 16 |
| Published IT capacity | 125 MW (5 of 269 sites publish) | 68 MW (17 of 18 sites publish) |
| Operational | 265 | 18 |
| Under construction / announced | 4 | 0 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 12 | 0 |
| AI-ready sites | 32 | 2 |
| Most common certifications | ISO 27001, PCI DSS, ISO 22301, ISO 9001 | Tier III Ready (per operator), ISO, ENS-Alto, ENS (Alto) |
| Average Coloprice Score | 34/100 across 269 scored sites | 30/100 across 18 scored sites |
| Awards and badges | 299 | 11 |
| Highest-scored facility | Equinix SL2x (60/100) | Templus MAD01 (40/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: Equinix — 269; Templus — 18
- Countries: Equinix — 37; Templus — 8
- Cities: Equinix — 110; Templus — 16
- Published IT capacity: Equinix — 125 MW (5 of 269 sites publish); Templus — 68 MW (17 of 18 sites publish)
- Operational: Equinix — 265; Templus — 18
- Under construction / announced: Equinix — 4; Templus — 0
- Liquid-cooled sites: Equinix — 12; Templus — 0
- AI-ready sites: Equinix — 32; Templus — 2
- Most common certifications: Equinix — ISO 27001, PCI DSS, ISO 22301, ISO 9001; Templus — Tier III Ready (per operator), ISO, ENS-Alto, ENS (Alto)
- Average Coloprice Score: Equinix — 34/100 across 269 scored sites; Templus — 30/100 across 18 scored sites
- Awards and badges: Equinix — 299; Templus — 11
- Highest-scored facility: Equinix — Equinix SL2x (60/100); Templus — Templus MAD01 (40/100)
Highest-scored facility
Equinix
Equinix SL2x
Seoul (Goyang), South Korea · 22 MW · 60/100
Templus
Templus MAD01
Alcalá de Henares (Madrid), Spain · 20 MW · 40/100
Open Equinix profile →Open Templus profile →
Other comparisons
Equinix vs NEXTDCCDC Data Centres vs EquinixEquinix vs VocusCologix vs EquinixEquinix vs eStruxtureEquinix vs Qu Data CentresEquinix vs GTDAscenty (Digital Realty) vs Equinix