Operator comparison
Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) vs MC Digital Realty
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) — 12 facilities in 1 countries, MC Digital Realty — 10 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ)
12
Tracked facilities · Countries: 1
Where they operate: Japan
MC Digital Realty
10
Tracked facilities · Countries: 1
Where they operate: Japan
Portfolios side by side
| Field | Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) | MC Digital Realty |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 12 | 10 |
| Countries | 1 | 1 |
| Cities | 5 | 2 |
| Published IT capacity | 20 MW (1 of 12 sites publish) | 217 MW (10 of 10 sites publish) |
| Operational | 12 | 9 |
| Under construction / announced | 0 | 1 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 0 | 3 |
| AI-ready sites | 0 | 3 |
| Most common certifications | ISO 14001, ISO 27001, FISC, JDCC Facility Standard Tier 3 | not published |
| Average Coloprice Score | 11/100 across 12 scored sites | 27/100 across 10 scored sites |
| Awards and badges | 2 | 7 |
| Highest-scored facility | IIJ Shiroi Data Center Campus (37/100) | MC Digital Realty NRT14 (38/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) — 12; MC Digital Realty — 10
- Cities: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) — 5; MC Digital Realty — 2
- Published IT capacity: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) — 20 MW (1 of 12 sites publish); MC Digital Realty — 217 MW (10 of 10 sites publish)
- Operational: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) — 12; MC Digital Realty — 9
- Under construction / announced: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) — 0; MC Digital Realty — 1
- Liquid-cooled sites: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) — 0; MC Digital Realty — 3
- AI-ready sites: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) — 0; MC Digital Realty — 3
- Average Coloprice Score: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) — 11/100 across 12 scored sites; MC Digital Realty — 27/100 across 10 scored sites
- Awards and badges: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) — 2; MC Digital Realty — 7
- Highest-scored facility: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) — IIJ Shiroi Data Center Campus (37/100); MC Digital Realty — MC Digital Realty NRT14 (38/100)
Published for only one side: Most common certifications.
Highest-scored facility
Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ)
IIJ Shiroi Data Center Campus
Tokyo, Japan · 20 MW · 37/100
MC Digital Realty
MC Digital Realty NRT14
Tokyo, Japan · 25 MW · 38/100
Open Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) profile →Open MC Digital Realty profile →
Other comparisons
Equinix vs Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ)Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ) vs NTT Communications (NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS) — NexcenterEquinix vs MC Digital RealtyMC Digital Realty vs NTT Communications (NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS) — Nexcenter