▮▮Coloprice

Operator comparison

iomart vs Pulsant

Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: iomart — 8 facilities in 1 countries, Pulsant — 14 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.

Portfolios side by side

FieldiomartPulsant
Tracked facilities814
Countries11
Cities710
Published IT capacity11 MW (1 of 8 sites publish)22 MW (14 of 14 sites publish)
Operational814
Under construction / announced00
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Most common certificationsCyber Essentials Plus, ISO 22301, ISO 27001, ISO 50001not published
Average Coloprice Score18/100 across 8 scored sites21/100 across 14 scored sites
Awards and badges33
Highest-scored facilityiomart Central London Data Centre (DC2) (50/100)Pulsant Edinburgh SC-1 (South Gyle) (24/100)

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: iomart — 8; Pulsant — 14
  • Cities: iomart — 7; Pulsant — 10
  • Published IT capacity: iomart — 11 MW (1 of 8 sites publish); Pulsant — 22 MW (14 of 14 sites publish)
  • Operational: iomart — 8; Pulsant — 14
  • Average Coloprice Score: iomart — 18/100 across 8 scored sites; Pulsant — 21/100 across 14 scored sites
  • Highest-scored facility: iomart — iomart Central London Data Centre (DC2) (50/100); Pulsant — Pulsant Edinburgh SC-1 (South Gyle) (24/100)

Published for only one side: Most common certifications.

Highest-scored facility

Open iomart profile →Open Pulsant profile →

Other comparisons

Digital Realty (Interxion) vs iomartEquinix vs iomartDigital Realty (Interxion) vs PulsantEquinix vs Pulsant