BESS comparison
BYD Energy Storage MC Cube-T Pro BESS vs REPT BATTERO Powtrix 3.0 DC Container (6.261 MWh)
Both columns come from what BYD Energy Storage and REPT BATTERO publish. Fields either maker does not publish are marked «not published»; we do not estimate or rank.
BYD Energy Storage
MC Cube-T Pro BESS
8.576 MWh
modular blockliquid-cooledLFPshipping
REPT BATTERO
Powtrix 3.0 DC Container (6.261 MWh)
6.262 MWh
20 ft containerliquid-cooledLFPshipping
Specifications side by side
| Field | BYD Energy Storage MC Cube-T Pro BESS | REPT BATTERO Powtrix 3.0 DC Container (6.261 MWh) |
|---|---|---|
| Max energy per enclosure | 8.576 MWh | 6.262 MWh |
| Max power per enclosure | 4.008 MW | 1.566 MW |
| Published durations | 2 h · 4 h | 4 h |
| Segment | utility-scale | utility-scale |
| Status | shipping | shipping |
| Cell chemistry | LFP | LFP |
| Cell capacity | not published | 392 Ah |
| Cell configuration | 2×6×1P416S (12-cube) / 2×8×1P416S (16-cube) | 416S12P |
| Cell supplier | not published | not published |
| Form factor | modular block | 20 ft container |
| Block type | DC block | DC block |
| PCS integrated | no | no |
| DC voltage | 1081.6–1489.3; 1331.2 nominal V | 1040–1500 V |
| Cooling | liquid-cooled | liquid-cooled |
| Ingress protection | IP55 | IP55 |
| Operating temperature | -30…55 °C | -30…55 °C |
| Dimensions (L × W × H) | 8815 × 2442 × 3170 mm | 6058 × 2438 × 2896 mm |
| Weight | not published | 49 t |
| Energy density | not published | not published |
| Round-trip efficiency | not published | not published |
| Cycle life | not published | not published |
| Calendar life | not published | not published |
| Warranty | not published | not published |
| Fire suppression | perfluorohexanone gas suppression + water spray | module-level active/passive thermal-runaway protection + container-level fire protection system |
| Generation | MC Cube-T Pro (China market, A-series) | Powtrix 3.0 |
| Announced | 2024-04 | not published |
| Certifications | GB 44240, GB/T 34131, GB/T 36276, GB/T 44026 | GB/T 36276-2023, IEC 60730-1-2022, IEC 61000-6-2-2016, IEC 61000-6-4-2018, IEC 62477-1-2012, IEC 62619-2022, IEC 62933-5-2-2022, IEC 63056-2020, IEEE Std 693-2018, ISO 3744-2010, NFPA 68-2023, NFPA 69-2024, NFPA 855, REACH, RoHS, UL 1973-2022, UL 9540-2023, UL 9540A-2019, UN 3536, UN 38.3 |
| Public datasheet | yes | yes |
Where they differ
Only fields both manufacturers publish and where the values are not identical. Not a judgement — the right choice depends on the project.
- Max energy per enclosure: MC Cube-T Pro BESS — 8.576 MWh; Powtrix 3.0 DC Container (6.261 MWh) — 6.262 MWh
- Max power per enclosure: MC Cube-T Pro BESS — 4.008 MW; Powtrix 3.0 DC Container (6.261 MWh) — 1.566 MW
- Published durations: MC Cube-T Pro BESS — 2 h · 4 h; Powtrix 3.0 DC Container (6.261 MWh) — 4 h
- Cell configuration: MC Cube-T Pro BESS — 2×6×1P416S (12-cube) / 2×8×1P416S (16-cube); Powtrix 3.0 DC Container (6.261 MWh) — 416S12P
- Form factor: MC Cube-T Pro BESS — modular block; Powtrix 3.0 DC Container (6.261 MWh) — 20 ft container
- DC voltage: MC Cube-T Pro BESS — 1081.6–1489.3; 1331.2 nominal V; Powtrix 3.0 DC Container (6.261 MWh) — 1040–1500 V
- Dimensions (L × W × H): MC Cube-T Pro BESS — 8815 × 2442 × 3170 mm; Powtrix 3.0 DC Container (6.261 MWh) — 6058 × 2438 × 2896 mm
- Fire suppression: MC Cube-T Pro BESS — perfluorohexanone gas suppression + water spray; Powtrix 3.0 DC Container (6.261 MWh) — module-level active/passive thermal-runaway protection + container-level fire protection system
- Generation: MC Cube-T Pro BESS — MC Cube-T Pro (China market, A-series); Powtrix 3.0 DC Container (6.261 MWh) — Powtrix 3.0
- Certifications: MC Cube-T Pro BESS — GB 44240, GB/T 34131, GB/T 36276, GB/T 44026; Powtrix 3.0 DC Container (6.261 MWh) — GB/T 36276-2023, IEC 60730-1-2022, IEC 61000-6-2-2016, IEC 61000-6-4-2018, IEC 62477-1-2012, IEC 62619-2022, IEC 62933-5-2-2022, IEC 63056-2020, IEEE Std 693-2018, ISO 3744-2010, NFPA 68-2023, NFPA 69-2024, NFPA 855, REACH, RoHS, UL 1973-2022, UL 9540-2023, UL 9540A-2019, UN 3536, UN 38.3
Published by only one of the two: Cell capacity, Weight, Announced.
Variants
BYD Energy Storage MC Cube-T Pro BESS variants
| Variants | Energy | Power | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|
| XH12C-B6012-A-R2 (6.0 MWh 2h) | 6.012 MWh | 3.006 MW | 2 h |
| XH12C-B6432-A-R4 (6.4 MWh 4h) | 6.432 MWh | 1.608 MW | 4 h |
| XH16C-B8016-A-R2 (8.0 MWh 2h) | 8.016 MWh | 4.008 MW | 2 h |
| XH16C-B8576-A-R4 (8.6 MWh 4h) | 8.576 MWh | 2.144 MW | 4 h |
REPT BATTERO Powtrix 3.0 DC Container (6.261 MWh) variants
| Variants | Energy | Power | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.261 MWh / 1565.5 kW (0.25P) | 6.262 MWh | 1.566 MW | 4 h |
Full model cards
Open BYD Energy Storage MC Cube-T Pro BESS →Open REPT BATTERO Powtrix 3.0 DC Container (6.261 MWh) →
Other comparisons
Gotion High-Tech Gotion Grid 5 MWh (ESD1331-05P5015) vs BYD Energy Storage MC Cube-T Pro BESSGotion High-Tech Gotion Grid 5 MWh (ESD1331-05P5015) vs REPT BATTERO Powtrix 3.0 DC Container (6.261 MWh)Pylontech Container L5000-BAT vs BYD Energy Storage MC Cube-T Pro BESSPylontech Container L5000-BAT vs REPT BATTERO Powtrix 3.0 DC Container (6.261 MWh)Sunwoda Energy NoahX 2.0 (NoahX-1500/4170, NoahX-1500/5015-L2) vs BYD Energy Storage MC Cube-T Pro BESSSunwoda Energy NoahX 2.0 (NoahX-1500/4170, NoahX-1500/5015-L2) vs REPT BATTERO Powtrix 3.0 DC Container (6.261 MWh)CATL TENER vs BYD Energy Storage MC Cube-T Pro BESSCATL TENER vs REPT BATTERO Powtrix 3.0 DC Container (6.261 MWh)