▮▮Coloprice

Coloprice Score · methodology 2026.08

Data center Denmark: 5 facilities compared

Compare 5 Denmark facilities across 2 operators from published evidence, with links to each site’s status, disclosed specifications and sourcing record.

5 facilitiesColoprice Score · 38 out of 100

Top 5 by Coloprice Score

Who is in this list: Every facility in the catalog located in Denmark — operational, under construction and announced. Status is visible in the maturity axis.

#FacilityOperatorLocationMWScoreClassAxes
1CPH1Digital Realty (Interxion)Ballerup38D
2CPH2Digital Realty (Interxion)Ballerup38D
3CPH3Digital Realty (Interxion)Ballerup38D
4CPH-RSDigital Realty (Interxion)Copenhagen34E
5STACK COP02STACK InfrastructureCopenhagen7218limited data

CC BY 4.0 · Coloprice data and compilation: free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 with attribution. Figures credited to third parties remain with their sources. License & attribution

Operators of facilities in this list can embed the award badge («Best data center in Denmark», «Top 10» …) free of charge — it is on the facility page under «Awards & badges» and links back here.

Denmark data center procurement checklist

A Denmark shortlist should distinguish hyperscale campuses, enterprise colocation and carrier-connected facilities. Country or operator reputation does not replace evidence for the exact hall, phase and service being contracted.

Confirm live IT load, density, cooling, redundancy, fibre routes, compliance scope, delivery date and expansion rights. Compare electricity, capacity, cross-connect, setup, remote-hands and escalation charges on one RFP basis.

Data center Denmark: 5 facilities compared FAQ

How should a Denmark data center be compared?

Use one requirement for power, density, redundancy, carriers, delivery and term, and verify every item for the exact facility.

Does the ranking guarantee capacity?

No. It ranks published facility evidence; current availability requires confirmation from the operator.

How we ranked them

Coloprice Score is a 0–100 total of five axes: resilience (tier level weighted by the class of evidence, up to 35), compliance (independent audits, up to 20), transparency (how many of seven key fields are published, up to 20), scale (published MW on a log scale plus liquid cooling and AI readiness, up to 15) and maturity (status and age, up to 10). Every input is a field on the facility card, and every card cites its sources.

Nothing here is opinion or paid placement: an operator can only move up by publishing more data or citing more certificates. A dashed class means the operator disclosed too little for a class to be assigned honestly — the score is still computed. Full methodology, class thresholds and the top-50 across all countries: Coloprice Score rankings.

Get quotes from these facilities

Tell us the market and capacity — we match your request with operators in this list and return real quotes. Free for buyers.

We reply within one business day. No spam, no reselling your contacts.