▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Kasuya, Fukuoka, Japan vs Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Kasuya, Fukuoka — 4 facilities from 4 operators, Yokohama, Kanagawa — 5 facilities from 4 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldKasuya, FukuokaYokohama, Kanagawa
Tracked facilities45
Operators44
Published IT capacitynot published19 MW (1 of 5 sites publish)
Operational45
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites00
Sites with any certification01
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month$280 (country-level)$280 (country-level)
Benchmark change, yoy0%0%
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.185$0.185
Average Coloprice Score9/100 across 4 sites14/100 across 5 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Kasuya, Fukuoka — 4; Yokohama, Kanagawa — 5
  • Operational: Kasuya, Fukuoka — 4; Yokohama, Kanagawa — 5
  • Sites with any certification: Kasuya, Fukuoka — 0; Yokohama, Kanagawa — 1
  • Average Coloprice Score: Kasuya, Fukuoka — 9/100 across 4 sites; Yokohama, Kanagawa — 14/100 across 5 sites

Published for only one side: Published IT capacity.

Top facilities by score

Kasuya, Fukuoka, Japan

Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Open Kasuya, Fukuoka data centers →Open Yokohama, Kanagawa data centers →Colocation pricing in Kasuya, Fukuoka →Colocation pricing in Yokohama, Kanagawa →

Other comparisons

Kasuya, Fukuoka vs Tokyo (Inzai)Kasuya, Fukuoka vs Osaka (Ibaraki)Tokyo (Inzai) vs Yokohama, KanagawaOsaka (Ibaraki) vs Yokohama, Kanagawa