Market comparison
Kasuya, Fukuoka, Japan vs Osaka (Ibaraki), Japan
Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Kasuya, Fukuoka — 4 facilities from 4 operators, Osaka (Ibaraki) — 32 facilities from 16 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.
Kasuya, Fukuoka, Japan
4
Tracked facilities · Operators: 4
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month: $280 (country-level)
Osaka (Ibaraki), Japan
32
Tracked facilities · Operators: 16
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month: $280 (country-level)
Markets side by side
| Field | Kasuya, Fukuoka | Osaka (Ibaraki) |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 4 | 32 |
| Operators | 4 | 16 |
| Published IT capacity | not published | 289 MW (11 of 32 sites publish) |
| Operational | 4 | 27 |
| Under construction / announced | 0 | 5 |
| Tier III+ certified sites | 0 | 0 |
| Sites with any certification | 0 | 6 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 0 | 4 |
| AI-ready sites | 0 | 3 |
| Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month | $280 (country-level) | $280 (country-level) |
| Benchmark change, yoy | 0% | 0% |
| Industrial power tariff, $/kWh | $0.185 | $0.185 |
| Average Coloprice Score | 9/100 across 4 sites | 18/100 across 32 sites |
| Latency between the two | not published | |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: Kasuya, Fukuoka — 4; Osaka (Ibaraki) — 32
- Operators: Kasuya, Fukuoka — 4; Osaka (Ibaraki) — 16
- Operational: Kasuya, Fukuoka — 4; Osaka (Ibaraki) — 27
- Under construction / announced: Kasuya, Fukuoka — 0; Osaka (Ibaraki) — 5
- Sites with any certification: Kasuya, Fukuoka — 0; Osaka (Ibaraki) — 6
- Liquid-cooled sites: Kasuya, Fukuoka — 0; Osaka (Ibaraki) — 4
- AI-ready sites: Kasuya, Fukuoka — 0; Osaka (Ibaraki) — 3
- Average Coloprice Score: Kasuya, Fukuoka — 9/100 across 4 sites; Osaka (Ibaraki) — 18/100 across 32 sites
Published for only one side: Published IT capacity.
Top facilities by score
Kasuya, Fukuoka, Japan
- AT TOKYO Kyushu Center 1 (QC1) AT TOKYO
- QTnet Fukuoka Data Center 3(QD3) QTnet
- IIJ Fukuoka Airport Data Center Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ)
Osaka (Ibaraki), Japan
- Equinix OS3 Equinix
- Equinix OS1 Equinix
- Equinix OS2x Equinix
Open Kasuya, Fukuoka data centers →Open Osaka (Ibaraki) data centers →Colocation pricing in Kasuya, Fukuoka →Colocation pricing in Osaka (Ibaraki) →
Other comparisons
Kasuya, Fukuoka vs Tokyo (Inzai)Kasuya, Fukuoka vs Yokohama, KanagawaOsaka (Ibaraki) vs Tokyo (Inzai)Osaka (Ibaraki) vs Yokohama, Kanagawa