Market comparison
Osaka (Ibaraki), Japan vs Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 34 facilities from 17 operators, Yokohama, Kanagawa — 5 facilities from 4 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.
Osaka (Ibaraki), Japan
34
Tracked facilities · Operators: 17
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month: $280 (country-level)
Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
5
Tracked facilities · Operators: 4
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month: $280 (country-level)
Markets side by side
| Field | Osaka (Ibaraki) | Yokohama, Kanagawa |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 34 | 5 |
| Operators | 17 | 4 |
| Published IT capacity | 359 MW (13 of 34 sites publish) | 19 MW (1 of 5 sites publish) |
| Operational | 29 | 5 |
| Under construction / announced | 5 | 0 |
| Tier III+ certified sites | 0 | 0 |
| Sites with any certification | 6 | 1 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 4 | 0 |
| AI-ready sites | 3 | 0 |
| Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month | $280 (country-level) | $280 (country-level) |
| Benchmark change, yoy | 0% | 0% |
| Industrial power tariff, $/kWh | $0.185 | $0.185 |
| Average Coloprice Score | 19/100 across 34 sites | 14/100 across 5 sites |
| Latency between the two | not published | |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 34; Yokohama, Kanagawa — 5
- Operators: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 17; Yokohama, Kanagawa — 4
- Published IT capacity: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 359 MW (13 of 34 sites publish); Yokohama, Kanagawa — 19 MW (1 of 5 sites publish)
- Operational: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 29; Yokohama, Kanagawa — 5
- Under construction / announced: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 5; Yokohama, Kanagawa — 0
- Sites with any certification: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 6; Yokohama, Kanagawa — 1
- Liquid-cooled sites: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 4; Yokohama, Kanagawa — 0
- AI-ready sites: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 3; Yokohama, Kanagawa — 0
- Average Coloprice Score: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 19/100 across 34 sites; Yokohama, Kanagawa — 14/100 across 5 sites
Top facilities by score
Osaka (Ibaraki), Japan
- Equinix OS3 Equinix
- Equinix OS1 Equinix
- Equinix OS2x Equinix
Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
- Digital Edge TYO4/5/6 Digital Edge · 18.5 MW
- CTC Yokohama Computer Center (YCC) CTC (ITOCHU Techno-Solutions)
- Nexcenter Yokohama 1 Data Center NTT Communications (NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS) — Nexcenter
Open Osaka (Ibaraki) data centers →Open Yokohama, Kanagawa data centers →Colocation pricing in Osaka (Ibaraki) →Colocation pricing in Yokohama, Kanagawa →
Other comparisons
Osaka (Ibaraki) vs Tokyo (Inzai)Kasuya, Fukuoka vs Osaka (Ibaraki)Tokyo (Inzai) vs Yokohama, KanagawaKasuya, Fukuoka vs Yokohama, Kanagawa