Market comparison
Tokyo (Inzai), Japan vs Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Tokyo (Inzai) — 67 facilities from 20 operators, Yokohama, Kanagawa — 4 facilities from 3 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.
Tokyo (Inzai), Japan
67
Tracked facilities · Operators: 20
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month: $280
Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
4
Tracked facilities · Operators: 3
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month: $280 (country-level)
Markets side by side
| Field | Tokyo (Inzai) | Yokohama, Kanagawa |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 67 | 4 |
| Operators | 20 | 3 |
| Published IT capacity | 1,561 MW (30 of 67 sites publish) | 19 MW (1 of 4 sites publish) |
| Operational | 59 | 4 |
| Under construction / announced | 8 | 0 |
| Tier III+ certified sites | 2 | 0 |
| Sites with any certification | 21 | 0 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 7 | 0 |
| AI-ready sites | 7 | 0 |
| Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month | $280 | $280 (country-level) |
| Benchmark change, yoy | 0% | 0% |
| Industrial power tariff, $/kWh | $0.185 | $0.185 |
| Average Coloprice Score | 25/100 across 67 sites | 12/100 across 4 sites |
| Latency between the two | not published | |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: Tokyo (Inzai) — 67; Yokohama, Kanagawa — 4
- Operators: Tokyo (Inzai) — 20; Yokohama, Kanagawa — 3
- Published IT capacity: Tokyo (Inzai) — 1,561 MW (30 of 67 sites publish); Yokohama, Kanagawa — 19 MW (1 of 4 sites publish)
- Operational: Tokyo (Inzai) — 59; Yokohama, Kanagawa — 4
- Under construction / announced: Tokyo (Inzai) — 8; Yokohama, Kanagawa — 0
- Tier III+ certified sites: Tokyo (Inzai) — 2; Yokohama, Kanagawa — 0
- Sites with any certification: Tokyo (Inzai) — 21; Yokohama, Kanagawa — 0
- Liquid-cooled sites: Tokyo (Inzai) — 7; Yokohama, Kanagawa — 0
- AI-ready sites: Tokyo (Inzai) — 7; Yokohama, Kanagawa — 0
- Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month: Tokyo (Inzai) — $280; Yokohama, Kanagawa — $280 (country-level)
- Average Coloprice Score: Tokyo (Inzai) — 25/100 across 67 sites; Yokohama, Kanagawa — 12/100 across 4 sites
Top facilities by score
Tokyo (Inzai), Japan
- Equinix TY12x Equinix · 54 MW
- Telehouse Tokyo Tama 3 Telehouse (KDDI)
- Equinix TY15 Equinix
Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
- Digital Edge TYO4/5/6 Digital Edge · 18.5 MW
- Nexcenter Yokohama 1 Data Center NTT Communications (NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS) — Nexcenter
- IIJ Yokohama 1 (Kohoku) Data Center Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ)
Open Tokyo (Inzai) data centers →Open Yokohama, Kanagawa data centers →Colocation pricing in Tokyo (Inzai) →Colocation pricing in Yokohama, Kanagawa →
Other comparisons
Osaka (Ibaraki) vs Tokyo (Inzai)Seika (Kyoto Prefecture) vs Tokyo (Inzai)Tokyo (Inzai) vs SeoulOsaka (Ibaraki) vs Yokohama, KanagawaSeika (Kyoto Prefecture) vs Yokohama, Kanagawa