▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Eindhoven, Netherlands vs Rotterdam, Netherlands

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Eindhoven — 6 facilities from 5 operators, Rotterdam — 7 facilities from 5 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldEindhovenRotterdam
Tracked facilities67
Operators55
Published IT capacity7 MW (2 of 6 sites publish)15 MW (3 of 7 sites publish)
Operational67
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites10
Sites with any certification33
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month$180 (country-level)$180 (country-level)
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.179$0.179
Average Coloprice Score29/100 across 6 sites29/100 across 7 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Eindhoven — 6; Rotterdam — 7
  • Published IT capacity: Eindhoven — 7 MW (2 of 6 sites publish); Rotterdam — 15 MW (3 of 7 sites publish)
  • Operational: Eindhoven — 6; Rotterdam — 7
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Eindhoven — 1; Rotterdam — 0
  • Average Coloprice Score: Eindhoven — 29/100 across 6 sites; Rotterdam — 29/100 across 7 sites

Top facilities by score

Eindhoven, Netherlands

Rotterdam, Netherlands

Open Eindhoven data centers →Open Rotterdam data centers →Colocation pricing in Eindhoven →Colocation pricing in Rotterdam →

Other comparisons

Amsterdam vs EindhovenEindhoven vs GroningenAmsterdam vs RotterdamGroningen vs Rotterdam