▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Groningen, Netherlands vs Rotterdam, Netherlands

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Groningen — 3 facilities from 2 operators, Rotterdam — 3 facilities from 1 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldGroningenRotterdam
Tracked facilities33
Operators21
Published IT capacity10 MW (3 of 3 sites publish)15 MW (3 of 3 sites publish)
Operational33
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites00
Sites with any certification23
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.179$0.179
Average Coloprice Score41/100 across 3 sites53/100 across 3 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Operators: Groningen — 2; Rotterdam — 1
  • Published IT capacity: Groningen — 10 MW (3 of 3 sites publish); Rotterdam — 15 MW (3 of 3 sites publish)
  • Sites with any certification: Groningen — 2; Rotterdam — 3
  • Average Coloprice Score: Groningen — 41/100 across 3 sites; Rotterdam — 53/100 across 3 sites

Top facilities by score

Groningen, Netherlands

Rotterdam, Netherlands

Open Groningen data centers →Open Rotterdam data centers →Colocation pricing in Groningen →Colocation pricing in Rotterdam →

Other comparisons

Amsterdam vs GroningenEindhoven vs GroningenAmsterdam vs RotterdamEindhoven vs Rotterdam