▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Groningen, Netherlands vs Rotterdam, Netherlands

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Groningen — 4 facilities from 3 operators, Rotterdam — 7 facilities from 5 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldGroningenRotterdam
Tracked facilities47
Operators35
Published IT capacity10 MW (3 of 4 sites publish)15 MW (3 of 7 sites publish)
Operational47
Under construction / announced00
Tier III+ certified sites00
Sites with any certification23
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month$180 (country-level)$180 (country-level)
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.179$0.179
Average Coloprice Score33/100 across 4 sites29/100 across 7 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Groningen — 4; Rotterdam — 7
  • Operators: Groningen — 3; Rotterdam — 5
  • Published IT capacity: Groningen — 10 MW (3 of 4 sites publish); Rotterdam — 15 MW (3 of 7 sites publish)
  • Operational: Groningen — 4; Rotterdam — 7
  • Sites with any certification: Groningen — 2; Rotterdam — 3
  • Average Coloprice Score: Groningen — 33/100 across 4 sites; Rotterdam — 29/100 across 7 sites

Top facilities by score

Groningen, Netherlands

Rotterdam, Netherlands

Open Groningen data centers →Open Rotterdam data centers →Colocation pricing in Groningen →Colocation pricing in Rotterdam →

Other comparisons

Amsterdam vs GroningenEindhoven vs GroningenAmsterdam vs RotterdamEindhoven vs Rotterdam