Operator comparison
Google vs Open DC
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: Google — 24 facilities in 2 countries, Open DC — 5 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
24
Tracked facilities · Countries: 2
Where they operate: Malaysia, United States
Open DC
5
Tracked facilities · Countries: 1
Where they operate: Malaysia
Portfolios side by side
| Field | Open DC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 24 | 5 |
| Countries | 2 | 1 |
| Cities | 24 | 4 |
| Published IT capacity | 2,700 MW (1 of 24 sites publish) | 5 MW (2 of 5 sites publish) |
| Operational | 12 | 5 |
| Under construction / announced | 12 | 0 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 2 | 0 |
| AI-ready sites | 21 | 1 |
| Most common certifications | not published | ISO 27001, ISO 9001, PCI DSS, ANSI/TIA-942 Design - Rated 3 |
| Average Coloprice Score | 7/100 across 24 scored sites | 21/100 across 5 scored sites |
| Awards and badges | not published | 1 |
| Highest-scored facility | Google Project Tembo (Laramie County) (17/100) | Open DC JB2 (29/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: Google — 24; Open DC — 5
- Countries: Google — 2; Open DC — 1
- Cities: Google — 24; Open DC — 4
- Published IT capacity: Google — 2,700 MW (1 of 24 sites publish); Open DC — 5 MW (2 of 5 sites publish)
- Operational: Google — 12; Open DC — 5
- Under construction / announced: Google — 12; Open DC — 0
- Liquid-cooled sites: Google — 2; Open DC — 0
- AI-ready sites: Google — 21; Open DC — 1
- Average Coloprice Score: Google — 7/100 across 24 scored sites; Open DC — 21/100 across 5 scored sites
- Highest-scored facility: Google — Google Project Tembo (Laramie County) (17/100); Open DC — Open DC JB2 (29/100)
Published for only one side: Most common certifications, Awards and badges.
Highest-scored facility
Google Project Tembo (Laramie County)
Cheyenne, WY, United States · 2700 MW · 17/100
Open DC
Open DC JB2
Johor Bahru, Malaysia · 0.3 MW · 29/100
Open Google profile →Open Open DC profile →
Other comparisons
AIMS Data Centre vs GoogleBridge Data Centres vs GoogleAIMS Data Centre vs Open DCBridge Data Centres vs Open DC