Operator comparison
eStruxture vs Qu Data Centres
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: eStruxture — 16 facilities in 1 countries, Qu Data Centres — 10 facilities in 1 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
eStruxture
16
Tracked facilities · Countries: 1
Where they operate: Canada
Qu Data Centres
10
Tracked facilities · Countries: 1
Where they operate: Canada
Portfolios side by side
| Field | eStruxture | Qu Data Centres |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 16 | 10 |
| Countries | 1 | 1 |
| Cities | 10 | 7 |
| Published IT capacity | 127 MW (12 of 16 sites publish) | 27 MW (7 of 10 sites publish) |
| Operational | 15 | 10 |
| Under construction / announced | 1 | 0 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 0 | 0 |
| AI-ready sites | 4 | 0 |
| Most common certifications | ISO 27001:2013, PCI DSS, SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II | CSAE 3416, ISAE 3402, SOC 1, SOC 2 |
| Average Coloprice Score | 35/100 across 16 scored sites | 38/100 across 10 scored sites |
| Awards and badges | 13 | 8 |
| Highest-scored facility | eStruxture MTL-2 (44/100) | Qu Data Centres TOR3 (53/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: eStruxture — 16; Qu Data Centres — 10
- Cities: eStruxture — 10; Qu Data Centres — 7
- Published IT capacity: eStruxture — 127 MW (12 of 16 sites publish); Qu Data Centres — 27 MW (7 of 10 sites publish)
- Operational: eStruxture — 15; Qu Data Centres — 10
- Under construction / announced: eStruxture — 1; Qu Data Centres — 0
- AI-ready sites: eStruxture — 4; Qu Data Centres — 0
- Most common certifications: eStruxture — ISO 27001:2013, PCI DSS, SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II; Qu Data Centres — CSAE 3416, ISAE 3402, SOC 1, SOC 2
- Average Coloprice Score: eStruxture — 35/100 across 16 scored sites; Qu Data Centres — 38/100 across 10 scored sites
- Awards and badges: eStruxture — 13; Qu Data Centres — 8
- Highest-scored facility: eStruxture — eStruxture MTL-2 (44/100); Qu Data Centres — Qu Data Centres TOR3 (53/100)
Highest-scored facility
eStruxture
eStruxture MTL-2
Montreal, Canada · 30 MW · 44/100
Qu Data Centres
Qu Data Centres TOR3
Markham, Canada · 10 MW · 53/100
Open eStruxture profile →Open Qu Data Centres profile →
Other comparisons
Cologix vs eStruxtureEquinix vs eStruxtureCologix vs Qu Data CentresEquinix vs Qu Data Centres