Operator comparison
Iron Mountain vs Templus
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: Iron Mountain — 48 facilities in 7 countries, Templus — 18 facilities in 8 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
Iron Mountain
48
Tracked facilities · Countries: 7
Where they operate: Germany, India, Netherlands, Singapore, Spain, United Kingdom, United States
Templus
18
Tracked facilities · Countries: 8
Where they operate: Denmark, France, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom
Portfolios side by side
| Field | Iron Mountain | Templus |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 48 | 18 |
| Countries | 7 | 8 |
| Cities | 27 | 16 |
| Published IT capacity | 1,000 MW (44 of 48 sites publish) | 68 MW (17 of 18 sites publish) |
| Operational | 32 | 18 |
| Under construction / announced | 16 | 0 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 7 | 0 |
| AI-ready sites | 3 | 2 |
| Most common certifications | ISO 14001, ISO 22301, ISO 27001, ISO 9001 | Tier III Ready (per operator), ISO, ENS-Alto, ENS (Alto) |
| Average Coloprice Score | 42/100 across 48 scored sites | 30/100 across 18 scored sites |
| Awards and badges | 88 | 11 |
| Highest-scored facility | Iron Mountain CHI-1 (69/100) | Templus MAD01 (40/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: Iron Mountain — 48; Templus — 18
- Countries: Iron Mountain — 7; Templus — 8
- Cities: Iron Mountain — 27; Templus — 16
- Published IT capacity: Iron Mountain — 1,000 MW (44 of 48 sites publish); Templus — 68 MW (17 of 18 sites publish)
- Operational: Iron Mountain — 32; Templus — 18
- Under construction / announced: Iron Mountain — 16; Templus — 0
- Liquid-cooled sites: Iron Mountain — 7; Templus — 0
- AI-ready sites: Iron Mountain — 3; Templus — 2
- Most common certifications: Iron Mountain — ISO 14001, ISO 22301, ISO 27001, ISO 9001; Templus — Tier III Ready (per operator), ISO, ENS-Alto, ENS (Alto)
- Average Coloprice Score: Iron Mountain — 42/100 across 48 scored sites; Templus — 30/100 across 18 scored sites
- Awards and badges: Iron Mountain — 88; Templus — 11
- Highest-scored facility: Iron Mountain — Iron Mountain CHI-1 (69/100); Templus — Templus MAD01 (40/100)
Highest-scored facility
Iron Mountain
Iron Mountain CHI-1
Des Plaines, United States · 56 MW · 69/100
Templus
Templus MAD01
Alcalá de Henares (Madrid), Spain · 20 MW · 40/100
Open Iron Mountain profile →Open Templus profile →
Other comparisons
Equinix vs Iron MountainDigital Realty vs Iron MountainEquinix vs TemplusDigital Realty vs Templus