▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Berlin, Germany vs Hamburg, Germany

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Berlin — 17 facilities from 15 operators, Hamburg — 21 facilities from 15 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldBerlinHamburg
Tracked facilities1721
Operators1515
Published IT capacity105 MW (5 of 17 sites publish)5 MW (3 of 21 sites publish)
Operational1621
Under construction / announced10
Tier III+ certified sites01
Sites with any certification66
Liquid-cooled sites00
AI-ready sites00
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month$250 (country-level)$250 (country-level)
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.269$0.269
Average Coloprice Score16/100 across 17 sites13/100 across 21 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Berlin — 17; Hamburg — 21
  • Published IT capacity: Berlin — 105 MW (5 of 17 sites publish); Hamburg — 5 MW (3 of 21 sites publish)
  • Operational: Berlin — 16; Hamburg — 21
  • Under construction / announced: Berlin — 1; Hamburg — 0
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Berlin — 0; Hamburg — 1
  • Average Coloprice Score: Berlin — 16/100 across 17 sites; Hamburg — 13/100 across 21 sites

Top facilities by score

Berlin, Germany

Hamburg, Germany

Open Berlin data centers →Open Hamburg data centers →Colocation pricing in Berlin →Colocation pricing in Hamburg →

Other comparisons

Berlin vs FrankfurtBerlin vs MunichFrankfurt vs HamburgHamburg vs Munich