▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Hamburg, Germany vs Munich, Germany

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Hamburg — 7 facilities from 6 operators, Munich — 8 facilities from 5 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldHamburgMunich
Tracked facilities78
Operators65
Published IT capacity5 MW (3 of 7 sites publish)28 MW (7 of 8 sites publish)
Operational77
Under construction / announced01
Tier III+ certified sites10
Sites with any certification63
Liquid-cooled sites01
AI-ready sites01
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month$250 (country-level)$250 (country-level)
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.269$0.269
Average Coloprice Score22/100 across 7 sites24/100 across 8 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Hamburg — 7; Munich — 8
  • Operators: Hamburg — 6; Munich — 5
  • Published IT capacity: Hamburg — 5 MW (3 of 7 sites publish); Munich — 28 MW (7 of 8 sites publish)
  • Under construction / announced: Hamburg — 0; Munich — 1
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Hamburg — 1; Munich — 0
  • Sites with any certification: Hamburg — 6; Munich — 3
  • Liquid-cooled sites: Hamburg — 0; Munich — 1
  • AI-ready sites: Hamburg — 0; Munich — 1
  • Average Coloprice Score: Hamburg — 22/100 across 7 sites; Munich — 24/100 across 8 sites

Top facilities by score

Hamburg, Germany

Munich, Germany

Open Hamburg data centers →Open Munich data centers →Colocation pricing in Hamburg →Colocation pricing in Munich →

Other comparisons

Frankfurt vs HamburgBerlin vs HamburgFrankfurt vs MunichBerlin vs Munich