Market comparison
Osaka (Ibaraki), Japan vs Tokyo (Inzai), Japan
Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 24 facilities from 13 operators, Tokyo (Inzai) — 67 facilities from 20 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.
Osaka (Ibaraki), Japan
24
Tracked facilities · Operators: 13
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month: $280 (country-level)
Tokyo (Inzai), Japan
67
Tracked facilities · Operators: 20
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month: $280
Markets side by side
| Field | Osaka (Ibaraki) | Tokyo (Inzai) |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 24 | 67 |
| Operators | 13 | 20 |
| Published IT capacity | 265 MW (10 of 24 sites publish) | 1,561 MW (30 of 67 sites publish) |
| Operational | 20 | 59 |
| Under construction / announced | 4 | 8 |
| Tier III+ certified sites | 0 | 2 |
| Sites with any certification | 6 | 21 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 3 | 7 |
| AI-ready sites | 2 | 7 |
| Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month | $280 (country-level) | $280 |
| Benchmark change, yoy | 0% | 0% |
| Industrial power tariff, $/kWh | $0.185 | $0.185 |
| Average Coloprice Score | 21/100 across 24 sites | 25/100 across 67 sites |
| Latency between the two | not published | |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 24; Tokyo (Inzai) — 67
- Operators: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 13; Tokyo (Inzai) — 20
- Published IT capacity: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 265 MW (10 of 24 sites publish); Tokyo (Inzai) — 1,561 MW (30 of 67 sites publish)
- Operational: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 20; Tokyo (Inzai) — 59
- Under construction / announced: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 4; Tokyo (Inzai) — 8
- Tier III+ certified sites: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 0; Tokyo (Inzai) — 2
- Sites with any certification: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 6; Tokyo (Inzai) — 21
- Liquid-cooled sites: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 3; Tokyo (Inzai) — 7
- AI-ready sites: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 2; Tokyo (Inzai) — 7
- Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month: Osaka (Ibaraki) — $280 (country-level); Tokyo (Inzai) — $280
- Average Coloprice Score: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 21/100 across 24 sites; Tokyo (Inzai) — 25/100 across 67 sites
Top facilities by score
Osaka (Ibaraki), Japan
- Equinix OS3 Equinix
- Equinix OS1 Equinix
- Equinix OS2x Equinix
Tokyo (Inzai), Japan
- Equinix TY12x Equinix · 54 MW
- Telehouse Tokyo Tama 3 Telehouse (KDDI)
- Equinix TY15 Equinix
Open Osaka (Ibaraki) data centers →Open Tokyo (Inzai) data centers →Colocation pricing in Osaka (Ibaraki) →Colocation pricing in Tokyo (Inzai) →
Other comparisons
Osaka (Ibaraki) vs Yokohama, KanagawaOsaka (Ibaraki) vs Seika (Kyoto Prefecture)Tokyo (Inzai) vs Yokohama, KanagawaSeika (Kyoto Prefecture) vs Tokyo (Inzai)Tokyo (Inzai) vs Seoul