Market comparison
Osaka (Ibaraki), Japan vs Tokyo (Inzai), Japan
Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 34 facilities from 17 operators, Tokyo (Inzai) — 78 facilities from 23 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.
Osaka (Ibaraki), Japan
34
Tracked facilities · Operators: 17
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month: $280 (country-level)
Tokyo (Inzai), Japan
78
Tracked facilities · Operators: 23
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month: $280
Markets side by side
| Field | Osaka (Ibaraki) | Tokyo (Inzai) |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 34 | 78 |
| Operators | 17 | 23 |
| Published IT capacity | 359 MW (13 of 34 sites publish) | 1,841 MW (33 of 78 sites publish) |
| Operational | 29 | 66 |
| Under construction / announced | 5 | 12 |
| Tier III+ certified sites | 0 | 2 |
| Sites with any certification | 6 | 21 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 4 | 7 |
| AI-ready sites | 3 | 7 |
| Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month | $280 (country-level) | $280 |
| Benchmark change, yoy | 0% | 0% |
| Industrial power tariff, $/kWh | $0.185 | $0.185 |
| Average Coloprice Score | 19/100 across 34 sites | 23/100 across 78 sites |
| Latency between the two | not published | |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 34; Tokyo (Inzai) — 78
- Operators: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 17; Tokyo (Inzai) — 23
- Published IT capacity: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 359 MW (13 of 34 sites publish); Tokyo (Inzai) — 1,841 MW (33 of 78 sites publish)
- Operational: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 29; Tokyo (Inzai) — 66
- Under construction / announced: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 5; Tokyo (Inzai) — 12
- Tier III+ certified sites: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 0; Tokyo (Inzai) — 2
- Sites with any certification: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 6; Tokyo (Inzai) — 21
- Liquid-cooled sites: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 4; Tokyo (Inzai) — 7
- AI-ready sites: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 3; Tokyo (Inzai) — 7
- Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month: Osaka (Ibaraki) — $280 (country-level); Tokyo (Inzai) — $280
- Average Coloprice Score: Osaka (Ibaraki) — 19/100 across 34 sites; Tokyo (Inzai) — 23/100 across 78 sites
Top facilities by score
Osaka (Ibaraki), Japan
- Equinix OS3 Equinix
- Equinix OS1 Equinix
- Equinix OS2x Equinix
Tokyo (Inzai), Japan
- Equinix TY12x Equinix · 54 MW
- Telehouse Tokyo Tama 3 Telehouse
- Equinix TY15 Equinix
Open Osaka (Ibaraki) data centers →Open Tokyo (Inzai) data centers →Colocation pricing in Osaka (Ibaraki) →Colocation pricing in Tokyo (Inzai) →
Other comparisons
Osaka (Ibaraki) vs Yokohama, KanagawaKasuya, Fukuoka vs Osaka (Ibaraki)Tokyo (Inzai) vs Yokohama, KanagawaKasuya, Fukuoka vs Tokyo (Inzai)Tokyo (Inzai) vs Seoul