Market comparison
Seongnam (Pangyo), South Korea vs Seoul, South Korea
Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Seongnam (Pangyo) — 6 facilities from 5 operators, Seoul — 26 facilities from 11 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.
Seongnam (Pangyo), South Korea
6
Tracked facilities · Operators: 5
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month: not published
Seoul, South Korea
26
Tracked facilities · Operators: 11
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month: not published
Markets side by side
| Field | Seongnam (Pangyo) | Seoul |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 6 | 26 |
| Operators | 5 | 11 |
| Published IT capacity | 30 MW (1 of 6 sites publish) | 130 MW (5 of 26 sites publish) |
| Operational | 6 | 25 |
| Under construction / announced | 0 | 1 |
| Tier III+ certified sites | 1 | 4 |
| Sites with any certification | 1 | 8 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 0 | 0 |
| AI-ready sites | 0 | 1 |
| Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/month | not published | not published |
| Benchmark change, yoy | not published | not published |
| Industrial power tariff, $/kWh | $0.118 | $0.118 |
| Average Coloprice Score | 16/100 across 6 sites | 23/100 across 26 sites |
| Latency between the two | not published | |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: Seongnam (Pangyo) — 6; Seoul — 26
- Operators: Seongnam (Pangyo) — 5; Seoul — 11
- Published IT capacity: Seongnam (Pangyo) — 30 MW (1 of 6 sites publish); Seoul — 130 MW (5 of 26 sites publish)
- Operational: Seongnam (Pangyo) — 6; Seoul — 25
- Under construction / announced: Seongnam (Pangyo) — 0; Seoul — 1
- Tier III+ certified sites: Seongnam (Pangyo) — 1; Seoul — 4
- Sites with any certification: Seongnam (Pangyo) — 1; Seoul — 8
- AI-ready sites: Seongnam (Pangyo) — 0; Seoul — 1
- Average Coloprice Score: Seongnam (Pangyo) — 16/100 across 6 sites; Seoul — 23/100 across 26 sites
Top facilities by score
Seongnam (Pangyo), South Korea
- SK Broadband IDC Pangyo SK Broadband · 30 MW
- NHN Cloud Center (NCC1, Pangyo) NHN Cloud
- SK Broadband IDC Bundang SK Broadband
Seoul, South Korea
- Equinix SL2x Equinix · 22 MW
- Digital Realty ICN10 (Digital Seoul 1) Digital Realty · 12 MW
- STT Seoul 1 STT GDC Korea (joint venture with Hyosung Heavy Industries) · 30 MW
Open Seongnam (Pangyo) data centers →Open Seoul data centers →Colocation pricing in Seongnam (Pangyo) →Colocation pricing in Seoul →
Other comparisons
Incheon vs Seongnam (Pangyo)Incheon vs SeoulTokyo (Inzai) vs Seoul