Operator comparison
Ascenty (Digital Realty) vs KIO Networks
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 36 facilities in 4 countries, KIO Networks — 14 facilities in 4 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
Ascenty (Digital Realty)
36
Tracked facilities · Countries: 4
Where they operate: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico
KIO Networks
14
Tracked facilities · Countries: 4
Where they operate: Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Mexico, Panama
Portfolios side by side
| Field | Ascenty (Digital Realty) | KIO Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 36 | 14 |
| Countries | 4 | 4 |
| Cities | 12 | 11 |
| Published IT capacity | 618 MW (36 of 36 sites publish) | 56 MW (4 of 14 sites publish) |
| Operational | 31 | 14 |
| Under construction / announced | 5 | 0 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 1 | 1 |
| AI-ready sites | 1 | 0 |
| Most common certifications | ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II | ISO 9001, SSAE18 SOC 1, ISO 27001, ISO/IEC 37001:2016 |
| Average Coloprice Score | 35/100 across 36 scored sites | 33/100 across 14 scored sites |
| Awards and badges | 35 | 17 |
| Highest-scored facility | Ascenty São Paulo 5 (57/100) | KIO QRO|1 (El Marqués) (54/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 36; KIO Networks — 14
- Cities: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 12; KIO Networks — 11
- Published IT capacity: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 618 MW (36 of 36 sites publish); KIO Networks — 56 MW (4 of 14 sites publish)
- Operational: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 31; KIO Networks — 14
- Under construction / announced: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 5; KIO Networks — 0
- AI-ready sites: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 1; KIO Networks — 0
- Most common certifications: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II; KIO Networks — ISO 9001, SSAE18 SOC 1, ISO 27001, ISO/IEC 37001:2016
- Average Coloprice Score: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 35/100 across 36 scored sites; KIO Networks — 33/100 across 14 scored sites
- Awards and badges: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — 35; KIO Networks — 17
- Highest-scored facility: Ascenty (Digital Realty) — Ascenty São Paulo 5 (57/100); KIO Networks — KIO QRO|1 (El Marqués) (54/100)
Highest-scored facility
Ascenty (Digital Realty)
Ascenty São Paulo 5
Osasco, Brazil · 8 MW · 57/100
KIO Networks
KIO QRO|1 (El Marqués)
Querétaro, Mexico · 28 MW · 54/100
Open Ascenty (Digital Realty) profile →Open KIO Networks profile →
Other comparisons
Ascenty (Digital Realty) vs Scala Data CentersAscenty (Digital Realty) vs Elea Data CentersAscenty (Digital Realty) vs EquinixAscenty (Digital Realty) vs GTDAligned Data Centers vs Ascenty (Digital Realty)Aligned Data Centers vs KIO NetworksKIO Networks vs Scala Data Centers