Operator comparison
GTD vs Scala Data Centers
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: GTD — 9 facilities in 2 countries, Scala Data Centers — 31 facilities in 4 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
GTD
9
Tracked facilities · Countries: 2
Where they operate: Chile, Colombia
Scala Data Centers
31
Tracked facilities · Countries: 4
Where they operate: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico
Portfolios side by side
| Field | GTD | Scala Data Centers |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 9 | 31 |
| Countries | 2 | 4 |
| Cities | 3 | 14 |
| Published IT capacity | 8 MW (1 of 9 sites publish) | 319 MW (22 of 31 sites publish) |
| Operational | 9 | 13 |
| Under construction / announced | 0 | 18 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 0 | 0 |
| AI-ready sites | 0 | 0 |
| Most common certifications | Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Constructed Facility, Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Design Documents, Uptime Institute Gold Certification of Operational Sustainability, ISO 20000-1 | ANSI/TIA-942-B Rated 3 (Constructed Facility), ANSI/TIA-942-C Rated 3 (Constructed Facility), Carbon Neutral, ISO 14001 |
| Average Coloprice Score | 19/100 across 9 scored sites | 19/100 across 31 scored sites |
| Awards and badges | 7 | 17 |
| Highest-scored facility | GTD Panamericana (70/100) | Scala SGRUTB08 (Tamboré) (60/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-10-01; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: GTD — 9; Scala Data Centers — 31
- Countries: GTD — 2; Scala Data Centers — 4
- Cities: GTD — 3; Scala Data Centers — 14
- Published IT capacity: GTD — 8 MW (1 of 9 sites publish); Scala Data Centers — 319 MW (22 of 31 sites publish)
- Operational: GTD — 9; Scala Data Centers — 13
- Under construction / announced: GTD — 0; Scala Data Centers — 18
- Most common certifications: GTD — Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Constructed Facility, Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Design Documents, Uptime Institute Gold Certification of Operational Sustainability, ISO 20000-1; Scala Data Centers — ANSI/TIA-942-B Rated 3 (Constructed Facility), ANSI/TIA-942-C Rated 3 (Constructed Facility), Carbon Neutral, ISO 14001
- Average Coloprice Score: GTD — 19/100 across 9 scored sites; Scala Data Centers — 19/100 across 31 scored sites
- Awards and badges: GTD — 7; Scala Data Centers — 17
- Highest-scored facility: GTD — GTD Panamericana (70/100); Scala Data Centers — Scala SGRUTB08 (Tamboré) (60/100)
Highest-scored facility
GTD
GTD Panamericana
Santiago, Chile · 8 MW · 70/100
Scala Data Centers
Scala SGRUTB08 (Tamboré)
Barueri, Brazil · 24 MW · 60/100
Open GTD profile →Open Scala Data Centers profile →
Other comparisons
Ascenty (Digital Realty) vs GTDEquinix vs GTDAscenty (Digital Realty) vs Scala Data CentersBR.Digital vs Scala Data CentersElea Data Centers vs Scala Data CentersEquinix vs Scala Data Centers