Operator comparison
GTD vs Scala Data Centers
Both columns come from the facilities each operator publishes and Coloprice tracks: GTD — 9 facilities in 2 countries, Scala Data Centers — 31 facilities in 4 countries. Score is the independent Coloprice Score of each facility, averaged; it is never sold.
GTD
9
Tracked facilities · Countries: 2
Where they operate: Chile, Colombia
Scala Data Centers
31
Tracked facilities · Countries: 4
Where they operate: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico
Portfolios side by side
| Field | GTD | Scala Data Centers |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked facilities | 9 | 31 |
| Countries | 2 | 4 |
| Cities | 3 | 14 |
| Published IT capacity | 8 MW (1 of 9 sites publish) | 319 MW (22 of 31 sites publish) |
| Operational | 9 | 13 |
| Under construction / announced | 0 | 18 |
| Liquid-cooled sites | 0 | 0 |
| AI-ready sites | 0 | 0 |
| Most common certifications | Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Constructed Facility, Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Design Documents, Uptime Institute Gold Certification of Operational Sustainability, ISO 20000-1 | Carbon Neutral, ISO 14001, ISO 27001, ISO 27701 |
| Average Coloprice Score | 19/100 across 9 scored sites | 17/100 across 31 scored sites |
| Awards and badges | 5 | 14 |
| Highest-scored facility | GTD Panamericana (70/100) | Scala SGRUTB08 (Tamboré) (60/100) |
Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.
Where they differ
Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.
- Tracked facilities: GTD — 9; Scala Data Centers — 31
- Countries: GTD — 2; Scala Data Centers — 4
- Cities: GTD — 3; Scala Data Centers — 14
- Published IT capacity: GTD — 8 MW (1 of 9 sites publish); Scala Data Centers — 319 MW (22 of 31 sites publish)
- Operational: GTD — 9; Scala Data Centers — 13
- Under construction / announced: GTD — 0; Scala Data Centers — 18
- Most common certifications: GTD — Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Constructed Facility, Uptime Institute Tier III Certification of Design Documents, Uptime Institute Gold Certification of Operational Sustainability, ISO 20000-1; Scala Data Centers — Carbon Neutral, ISO 14001, ISO 27001, ISO 27701
- Average Coloprice Score: GTD — 19/100 across 9 scored sites; Scala Data Centers — 17/100 across 31 scored sites
- Awards and badges: GTD — 5; Scala Data Centers — 14
- Highest-scored facility: GTD — GTD Panamericana (70/100); Scala Data Centers — Scala SGRUTB08 (Tamboré) (60/100)
Highest-scored facility
GTD
GTD Panamericana
Santiago, Chile · 8 MW · 70/100
Scala Data Centers
Scala SGRUTB08 (Tamboré)
Barueri, Brazil · 24 MW · 60/100
Open GTD profile →Open Scala Data Centers profile →
Other comparisons
Equinix vs GTDAscenty (Digital Realty) vs GTDAscenty (Digital Realty) vs Scala Data CentersElea Data Centers vs Scala Data CentersEquinix vs Scala Data CentersKIO Networks vs Scala Data CentersAligned Data Centers vs Scala Data Centers