▮▮Coloprice

Market comparison

Almaty, Kazakhstan vs Astana, Kazakhstan

Both columns are built from the catalog and the price index: Almaty — 5 facilities from 5 operators, Astana — 6 facilities from 6 operators. Where a benchmark or a tariff is not published, the cell says so.

Markets side by side

FieldAlmatyAstana
Tracked facilities56
Operators56
Published IT capacity10 MW (3 of 5 sites publish)102 MW (2 of 6 sites publish)
Operational35
Under construction / announced21
Tier III+ certified sites45
Sites with any certification45
Liquid-cooled sites01
AI-ready sites11
Wholesale benchmark, $/kW/monthnot publishednot published
Benchmark change, yoynot publishednot published
Industrial power tariff, $/kWh$0.09$0.09
Average Coloprice Score36/100 across 5 sites34/100 across 6 sites
Latency between the twonot published

Counts are the Coloprice catalog as of 2026-09-26; benchmarks are the Colocation Price Index (Q3 2026). Operators publish some facts and not others — an empty cell means «not published», not zero.

Where they differ

Only fields both sides publish and where the values are not identical. This is not a judgement: the right choice depends on the workload, the contract and the site.

  • Tracked facilities: Almaty — 5; Astana — 6
  • Operators: Almaty — 5; Astana — 6
  • Published IT capacity: Almaty — 10 MW (3 of 5 sites publish); Astana — 102 MW (2 of 6 sites publish)
  • Operational: Almaty — 3; Astana — 5
  • Under construction / announced: Almaty — 2; Astana — 1
  • Tier III+ certified sites: Almaty — 4; Astana — 5
  • Sites with any certification: Almaty — 4; Astana — 5
  • Liquid-cooled sites: Almaty — 0; Astana — 1
  • Average Coloprice Score: Almaty — 36/100 across 5 sites; Astana — 34/100 across 6 sites

Top facilities by score

Almaty, Kazakhstan

Astana, Kazakhstan

Open Almaty data centers →Open Astana data centers →Colocation pricing in Almaty →Colocation pricing in Astana →